🔗 Share this article

Families of people buried in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.